massage and bodywork professionals

a community of practitioners

Ok...guess I'll be the first to start a discussion. I am a Reiki Master, and I teach Reiki to Massage Therapists and anyone else who wants to learn. However, I do not feel that I should teach just anyone how to be a Reiki Master, just because they pay me. I make the choice of who is allowed to come to the Reiki Master Course. What do you do? Am I being too cautious? I just feel that some people may only be taking the class to make money.....and Reiki is about healing, not making money. Don't get me wrong, I charge for the classes and my Reiki sessions, as Usui said we should, I just don't feel that some people are cut out to be Reiki Masters. What do you think?

Tags: master, reiki, training

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Each of us have traveled varied paths to become Reiki Master/Teacher. In my case, there was three months practice from Level 1 to Level 2 and a 12 month practice period between Level 2 and Master. I have seen individules take a weekend from no experience to master over a Fri/Sat/Sun weekend.

We as Master/Teacher use our intuition to provide healing on our clients and, therefore, should use our intuition upon attuning new Masters/Teachers. We are the gate keepers of the modility and should require our students to maintain a level of compentency before we perform the attunment. Some students will excel faster that others because they resonate with "Univeral Energy" and their intentions are pure and true. We should be above the drive for money, and be pure in our intent to insure good teachers are out there. Remember, everyone that you attune, represents your standards and beliefs in the system. Don't we have a duty to protect the public? In most professions, a basic level of knowledge and skill must be demonstrated before they can do the work.

Reply to This

My feelings exactly Frank. THANK YOU

Frank Ansel said:
Each of us have traveled varied paths to become Reiki Master/Teacher. In my case, there was three months practice from Level 1 to Level 2 and a 12 month practice period between Level 2 and Master. I have seen individules take a weekend from no experience to master over a Fri/Sat/Sun weekend.

We as Master/Teacher use our intuition to provide healing on our clients and, therefore, should use our intuition upon attuning new Masters/Teachers. We are the gate keepers of the modility and should require our students to maintain a level of compentency before we perform the attunment. Some students will excel faster that others because they resonate with "Univeral Energy" and their intentions are pure and true. We should be above the drive for money, and be pure in our intent to insure good teachers are out there. Remember, everyone that you attune, represents your standards and beliefs in the system. Don't we have a duty to protect the public? In most professions, a basic level of knowledge and skill must be demonstrated before they can do the work.

Reply to This

I agree with Terri on this point. I have been teaching Reiki since 1997. Having experienced several "Masters" that in my opinion to not respect the process of Reiki and misuse the abilities gained from the Master attunement. Walking the path of a Reiki Master is a huge commitment and a great responsibility. I will not open that door for just anyone willing to pay a fee. I would rather not charge a fee and teach one who is worthy than charge a fee and teach someone I feel will dishonor the path we have all chosen to walk. I feel this kind of discernent is part of the responsibilities we take on as Reiki Masters.

Peace and Harmony

Reply to This

I know a Reiki master/teacher who decided to not include "teacher designation" with the Level III Master attunement, and offers it separately. I think this is wise. I know many people who are Reiki masters and while they may be able to pass attunements, they see it as a parlor game. I think to sepearate the teacher designation allows her to discern who really ought to be passing the Reiki heritage to others. I know "teachers" who think it's just fine to give attunements for all three levels to somebody in the same day, because they think it's all about people getting as many attunements as they can! So sad...at the end of the day, nobody could be getting much out of it.

Reply to This

Hello everyone! I just joined the group and would like to add to your delicious discussion from a few months ago. I have been a Reiki Master since 1991 and was trained in the lineage that requires a fee of $10,000 for Reiki Master training. The entire purpose of becoming a master (as I've been taught) is to teach and pass on this glorious gift. My personal experience is that becoming a Reiki Master is a huge commitment that I continue to honor over a lifetime. Much like becoming a priestess or getting married, being a master requires the willingness to be in daily relationship with Reiki and allow Reiki to teach you and lead the way.

I agree with Terri's initial comment that some people aren't cut out to be Reiki Masters and, for me, being clear that mastery is for teaching helps to screen those people who just need a deeper, more consistent relationship with their Reiki practice or perhaps a professional element that needs to be developed.

One of the things I've learned in my many years of teaching Reiki is that money (at every level) has a valuable teaching element. I would love to hear some of your thoughts about how this reflects your expressed opinions about choosing who to initiate and when. I'd love to hear your thoughts. It's so refreshing to have a respectful conversation with all of you!

Reply to This

One of the greatest joys of being a Reiki master is the gift to teach Reiki to others and this also helps the whole planet.

Reply to This

I agree with your comment about the Universe decides who is a Reiki master. I know 2 Reiki Masters who do not teach or do anything except self reiki and distant reiki. they are still healers in my opinion, but I know they feel inadequate. I was told this by one such Reiki Master recently. She said she was in awe of what I could do with healing. That made her feel inadequate. I have since taught her more of what I know and she is feeling more excited about healing again. I determined that her previous teacher left out many things or perhaps only instructed parts of the course. Many times the teacher may not teach but just go through the book of choice and show the symbols and their use. My first teacher did an attunement and then said read these 3 books and practice on yourself. Well, that was totally disappointing. So I looked for a Reiki circle that would help me to understand more about it. I learned so much I took her classes and became a Reiki Master/Teacher over the period of a year. In closing I feel that the person who I mentioned will still probably do reiki the same as before except with more understanding and without the feeling of being inadequate. Just because she prefers not to teach is her choice or perhaps the choice of the Universe.

Al Flemming, LMT, NCTMB, ACMT said:
It is my opinion that yes, you can chose who will be in your master course. The exercise of caution, though, is wise so that the assumption of whatever reason that may have for not attuning an individual to Reiki Master, is not bases in the thought that they are not to be a Reiki Master. It is for the Universe to decide who attunes whom and how they are attuned. We don't know all that is in the Universal Mind. So, we can only go by what we have/know now, and let the Universe handle the rest.

The Universe calls Reiki Masters. Through training we learn basics and fundamentals. It is that calling, whether attuned by another individual or not, that determines whether or not a person is a "true" Reiki Master. Again, the Universe will take care of the Universe, and all that is within. An individual may pursue the path of Reiki Master, and even become attuned, but if that is not their true calling, the Universe will direct them to where they are supposed to be.

Reply to This

Just adding my two pennies here....

For the most part, given what I've been reading here, actually refusing a student is not the common theme--reflecting/projecting on the possibility is.

Is this present moment thinking? Not in my book.

Does this have anything to do with a student who may or may never present themselves. Nope.

Speaking only for myself--When I find myself faced with a yet to happen/may never happen scenerio, it's all about something I need to learn and am not seeing clearly...the 'possible projection' is just a mirror.

For me, I would change the question from why a student should be rejected...to why do I need to have the fear this would happen in the first place.

I learn from every teacher and student....may not be the lesson I expected...but gold was to be found none the same.

Reply to This

RSS

© 2010   Created by Lara Evans Bracciante.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!