When research results from those in favor of specific modalities are positive and results being presented by those in opposition state just the opposite, who are therapists going to believe?
How do you feel the researcher's predisposed attitude affects the study? Are therapists as likely to accept the results knowing this, either way?
Should institutions financially support studies on both sides, if it has not been researched enough for a definitive decision? What about when researchers just pass on information they recieve and it is wrong?